Judicial Selection Materials
General
Published in the ABA Judicial Division's
The Judges' Journal, this study examines the institutional and political circumstances in which minority and women judges are most likely to be selected to state courts. It also provides an overview of the extent of judicial diversity over time and in 2008.
Revised in 2008, these provisions offer exemplary language for establishing judicial nomination and evaluation processes of the highest quality and represent American Judicature Society policy as to the “best practices” in selecting, retaining, and evaluating judges.
Prepared for state legislators, this guide promotes greater understanding of the complex and critical issue of selecting state court judges.
Examines successful judicial selection reform efforts in six states, discussing the nature of each reform and its implementation in other states, the events that provided the impetus for reform, and the actors who were instrumental in bringing about the reform.
Describes the historical evolution of judicial selection in the United States.
A set of tables that provide basic information about the initial selection and subsequent retention of state judges. Below are links to the individual tables.
Merit Selection
A set of tables that provide detailed information about selection provisions in states with "merit selection," or commission-based appointment, of judges.
Synthesizes existing social science research on merit selection. [Cite as: Malia Reddick,
Merit Selection: A Review of the Social Scientific Literature, 106 DICK. L. REV. 729 (2002)]
According to this study of ten states in which judicial nominating commissions have a role in selecting judges, more diverse commissions attract more diverse applicant pools and produce more diverse nominee lists.
Describes the merit selection process and its advantages over other methods of judicial selection.
A chronology of successful and unsuccessful statewide merit selection ballot measures.
Depicts by decade the adoption of judicial merit selection by constitution or statute, to fill some or all vacancies. The final map, Judicial Merit Selection Today, also includes states with executive order merit plans.
Judicial Performance Evaluation
Assesses the impact of court-sponsored JPE programs in four states--Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah. Based on exit polls of voters, and surveys of judges and performance evaluation commission members.
Handbook for Judicial Nominating Commissioners, 2nd Edition